Direct Answer: What Changed for Haryana's HT Consumers in August 2026?
The Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC) notified two amendments—on 22 July 2026, effective upon gazette publication, and widely reported in early August 2026—that directly reduce demand-side cost risk for industrial and commercial consumers in DHBVN and UHBVN territory:
- HERC (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations, 2014 — Seventh Amendment, 2026: the surcharge-free excess-draw threshold rises from 105% to 110% of approved contract demand, with a graded surcharge of 20% for 110–115% and 25% beyond 115% (earlier: a flat 25% beyond 105%).
- HERC (Duty to Supply Electricity on Request, Power to Recover Expenditure Incurred in Providing Supply and Power to Require Security) Regulations, 2016 — Fourth Amendment, 2026: reducing load without a voltage change now costs only a processing fee capped at ₹20,000, and the original sanctioned load can be restored within three years without fresh service connection charges (SCC).
Practical conclusion: if your factory has been penalised for seasonal demand spikes—or has delayed right-sizing its contract demand because restoration was expensive—this is the window to recalibrate. And recalibrating contract demand is exactly the analysis that should precede sizing a rooftop solar plant.
Regulatory status last checked: 13 August 2026.
HERC August 2026 Amendments: Verified Snapshot
| Question | Current position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Which regulation governs excess contract demand? | HERC (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations, 2014, Seventh Amendment, 2026 | HERC; Punjab Kesari |
| New surcharge-free threshold | 110% of approved contract demand (was 105%) | TOI, The Tribune |
| Surcharge for 110–115% of contract demand | 20% of the applicable demand/energy charges on the excess | TOI, The Tribune |
| Surcharge beyond 115% | 25% on the excess (was flat 25% beyond 105%) | TOI, The Tribune |
| Cost to reduce load (no voltage change) | Processing fee capped at ₹20,000 | TOI, The Tribune |
| Cost to restore original load within 3 years | No fresh SCC (earlier ~₹2,000/kW) | Amar Ujala |
| Frequency limit | One reduction + one restoration per 3-year window | TOI, The Tribune |
| Lock-in after change | 6 months | TOI, The Tribune |
| Who is excluded? | Consumers with outstanding dues, pending disputes/court cases, or theft/unauthorised-use cases | TOI, The Tribune |
| Approximate beneficiaries | ~1.26 lakh industrial + ~8.47 lakh commercial HT/large-LT consumers | Amar Ujala |
| Notification date | 22 July 2026; effective upon gazette publication | Punjab Kesari |
What Is the New Excess-Demand Surcharge Structure?
Under the old Supply Code, exceeding your approved contract demand by more than 5% triggered a flat 25% surcharge on the excess demand. The Seventh Amendment softens this into a graded structure:
| Draw as % of approved contract demand | Surcharge before | Surcharge now |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 105% | None | None |
| 105–110% | 25% | None |
| 110–115% | 25% | 20% |
| Beyond 115% | 25% | 25% |
The immediate effect is that a factory with seasonal export orders or a temporary production ramp can absorb a 5–10% demand overshoot without any penalty, and a 10–15% overshoot at a reduced 20% rate. This is a material change for plants whose maximum demand fluctuates month to month.
Why Did HERC Do This?
Industry associations had pressed the Commission on the point that even a small, temporary excess attracted a disproportionate penalty. Pawan Yadav, president of the IMT Industrial Association, Manesar, told the Times of India: "Many manufacturing units see temporary spikes in demand because of export orders or seasonal production, and even a small increase earlier attracted a heavy surcharge. The revised norms will cut unnecessary costs and give industries more flexibility in planning production."
The amendment does not remove the incentive to keep contract demand accurate—it reduces the penalty for occasional, modest overshoot while retaining a 25% surcharge for sustained over-draw beyond 115%.
What Changed for Load Reduction and Restoration?
The Fourth Amendment to the Duty to Supply Regulations, 2016 removes a long-standing financial barrier to right-sizing sanctioned load.
The Old Problem
Previously, a factory that reduced its sanctioned load (for example, after an efficiency drive or a partial shift to solar) and later wanted to restore it had to pay fresh service connection charges at approximately ₹2,000 per kW—on top of processing fees and the advance consumption deposit. For a 1 MW restoration, that was a ₹20 lakh disincentive, which pushed many factories to keep an oversized contract demand and pay the fixed charges every month instead.
The New Rules
| Action | Old treatment | New treatment (Fourth Amendment) |
|---|---|---|
| Reduce load, no voltage change | SCC + processing fees | Processing fee only, capped at ₹20,000 |
| Restore original load within 3 years | Fresh SCC (~₹2,000/kW) | No fresh SCC |
| HT → LT shift | SCC on full load | SCC only on the revised load |
| Restoration above original load | — | SCC charged only on the incremental portion |
The amendment adds guardrails: a 6-month lock-in after any change, one reduction plus one restoration per 3-year window, restoration subject to the licensee confirming available capacity, and meter/CT replacement costs borne by the consumer. The advance consumption deposit remains payable. Consumers with outstanding dues, pending disputes or court cases, or theft/unauthorised-use cases are excluded.
Industrialist Pradeep Multani told the Times of India the decision "would improve ease of doing business… Allowing restoration without fresh service connection charges within three years will save both time and money, especially for MSMEs."
Why Does This Matter for a Rooftop Solar Decision?
Contract demand and solar sizing are the same problem viewed from opposite directions.
A rooftop solar plant reduces the energy you import from the grid, but it does not automatically reduce your contract demand or the fixed charges attached to it—DHBVN's net-metering rules are explicit that fixed and demand charges continue to apply. If your sanctioned load is materially higher than your post-solar maximum import, you are paying fixed charges on capacity you no longer use.
Before the Fourth Amendment, correcting that mismatch was expensive: reduce the load now, and if you later expanded or solar underperformed, restoring it cost ₹2,000/kW. That risk pushed many factories to keep an inflated contract demand as insurance.
The amendment changes the calculus. You can now:
- Commission the solar plant and observe your actual post-solar maximum demand over a few months.
- Reduce sanctioned load toward the real post-solar peak, paying at most ₹20,000 in processing fees.
- If you later expand or need the capacity back, restore the original load within three years without fresh SCC.
The saving is the monthly fixed charge on the surrendered demand. At DHBVN's FY 2026-27 rate of ₹290/kVA/month, surrendering 500 kVA of genuinely surplus contract demand is worth roughly ₹1.74 lakh per year in avoided fixed charges—recurring, and now reversible if your needs change. Model this against your own bill before acting; the right number depends on your load factor, time-of-day profile, and how much of your peak solar actually displaces.
A credible solar ROI model should show energy savings and demand-charge savings as separate lines—not blend them into one headline tariff.
What Should a Haryana Factory Do This Quarter?
- Pull 12 months of bills and extract billed maximum demand (or kVAh peak) versus sanctioned load for each month.
- Check your overshoot history. If you have paid excess-demand surcharges for seasonal spikes in the 105–115% band, the new threshold may already cover you going forward.
- If you have or are planning rooftop solar, model your post-solar maximum import demand and compare it with sanctioned load. A gap of more than ~15–20% is a candidate for a load reduction that is now cheap and, for three years, reversible.
- Do not assume eligibility. Confirm with DHBVN/UHBVN that your account has no outstanding dues, disputes, or theft cases—these are explicit exclusions.
- Sequence it. The 6-month lock-in and one-change-per-3-years limit mean this is a decision to make once, from interval load data, not month-to-month.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is HERC's new excess-demand surcharge threshold in 2026?
The Seventh Amendment to the HERC (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations, 2014 raises the surcharge-free threshold from 105% to 110% of approved contract demand. Excess draw between 110% and 115% attracts a 20% surcharge; beyond 115% the surcharge is 25%.
When did the HERC August 2026 amendments take effect?
HERC notified both amendments on 22 July 2026, effective upon publication in the Haryana Government Gazette. They were widely reported in the first week of August 2026.
How much does it now cost to reduce sanctioned load in Haryana?
For a load reduction without a change of supply voltage, the Fourth Amendment to the Duty to Supply Regulations, 2016 caps the processing fee at ₹20,000. Meter and CT replacement costs remain with the consumer, and the advance consumption deposit is still payable.
Can I restore my original sanctioned load after reducing it?
Yes. Within three years of a reduction, the original sanctioned load can be restored without fresh service connection charges—which were previously around ₹2,000 per kW. Restoration above the original load is charged only on the incremental portion.
Who is not eligible for the load-reduction and restoration relief?
Consumers with outstanding dues, pending disputes or court cases, or theft/unauthorised-use-of-electricity cases are excluded from the benefit.
Does a lower contract demand reduce my rooftop solar savings?
Not directly. Solar savings come primarily from avoided energy (kWh/kVAh) imports; contract-demand reduction saves fixed demand charges. The two are complementary: solar reduces your imported energy and, by lowering your true peak import, can make a contract-demand reduction safe to take. Model both separately.
Is the 110% threshold permanent?
The amendment is in force from gazette publication and remains so unless HERC revises it. It is a regulation change, not a time-limited scheme—but any future amendment could alter the thresholds, so verify against the current HERC order before relying on it for a capital decision.
Primary Sources
- HERC eases power surcharge norms, offers relief to consumers — Times of India, Chandigarh
- Haryana raises excess-demand threshold, reduces penalty burden on industries — Times of India, Gurgaon
- Haryana electricity panel eases surcharge norms, load restoration rules — The Tribune
- No SCC on restoration of old load within three years — Amar Ujala (beneficiary figures, ₹2,000/kW)
- Amendments notified 22 July 2026 — Punjab Kesari (Haryana)
- Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission — official site
Related Reading
- DHBVN Solar Net Metering Guide for Haryana Industry
- Haryana Industrial ToD Tariff and Smart-Meter Rebate, FY 2026-27
- HERC Open Access Surcharge in Haryana, 2026
- Solar Panel ROI and Payback Period in India
- Time-of-Day Tariff and Factory Solar Savings
- How to Size a Solar Plant for Your Factory
- Haryana Commercial Building Solar Mandate — Compliance Guide
- Solar Installation in Faridabad — Industrial Deep Dive
This article is informational and reflects HERC's Seventh Amendment to the Electricity Supply Code Regulations, 2014 and Fourth Amendment to the Duty to Supply Regulations, 2016 as reported on 13 August 2026. Obtain project-specific confirmation from DHBVN/UHBVN and your electrical and legal advisers before changing contract demand or ordering equipment.
Ready to Go Solar?
Get a free consultation and custom quote for your industrial or commercial facility. Start saving on energy costs today.
Get Free Quote